Best telescopes for planetary observation in 2025?

I've been into astronomy for a while now, and I've had my fair share of telescopes. For planetary observation, I swear by the Meade Instruments LX850. The resolution is superb, and it does an amazing job with color accuracy, especially on Jupiter and Saturn. The image quality is really sharp, and it's relatively easy to set up. That being said, the Celestron NexStar series is also a great choice - I've seen some fantastic images taken with those. If you're looking for alternatives, you might want to check out the Takahashi FS-102 or the Explore Scientific ED127 FCD-1. They're a bit pricier, but trust me, they're worth it. Don't just go by specs, though; read reviews from actual users and, if possible, try before you buy.

I agree with @marysmith that the Meade Instruments LX850 is a top contender for planetary observation, its optics are indeed superb. However, I'd like to throw another option into the mix: the Arefv 130mm f/7.0 refractor. While it's on the pricier side, its triplet apochromatic design ensures exceptional color correction and image sharpness. The Celestron NexStar series is great, but if you're willing to invest a bit more, the Arefv offers outstanding planetary views. That being said, @marysmith's advice to try before you buy is spot on - if possible, get a hands-on demo to see what works best for you. The Takahashi FS-102 is another excellent choice, but be prepared for a hefty price tag.

What strikes me about this debate is how much we tend to conflate specs with actual experience. Sure, a Takahashi or an Arefv might have mind-blowing optics on paper, but if the setup is a pain or if the mount isn’t stable, all that resolution gets wasted. For planetary observation, a stable mount and good tracking are just as crucial as aperture and lens quality. I’ve spent evenings frustrated with beautiful telescopes that just can’t hold a steady image on Jupiter’s bands or Saturn’s rings.

The Celestron NexStar series often gets underrated for its ease of use and solid mount technology, which can make a huge difference for beginners or casual observers. One thing I find annoying is how some people dismiss these pragmatic factors in favor of prestige optics alone. Also, color accuracy is tricky—no scope can magically fix atmospheric conditions or light pollution, so managing expectations is key.

If you can, try to attend local astronomy club meetups or public star parties. Seeing these scopes in action and talking to owners helped me more than any specs sheet. And remember: the best telescope is the one you actually use regularly, not the one that looks best on paper.

When it comes to planetary observation, balance is crucial. I've found that the telescope with the best optics won't do much good if your mount can’t keep up. The Celestron NexStar series is underrated for its stability and ease of use, which is key if you're new to stargazing. The LX850 and Arefv setups offer excellent optics, but they demand more precise handling, and a shaky mount can ruin an otherwise stellar view of Jupiter or Saturn.

I suggest prioritizing a model with a rock-solid mount because atmospheric conditions and tracking errors are constant challenges. Before shelling out for any high-end gear, try demoing a few options at local star parties. Direct hands-on experience is the best way to match your expectations with real-world performance.

The Arefv and Takahashi scopes are fantastic, no doubt, but let’s be real—unless you’re planning to drop a small fortune, they might be overkill for a beginner. The Celestron NexStar 8SE is a sweet spot: great optics, decent tracking, and it won’t leave you frustrated with setup hassles. I’ve used one myself, and while it’s not perfect, it punches above its weight for planetary detail.

What annoys me is how often people ignore the practical side. A scope that’s a pain to align or transport will gather dust. If you’re serious about planetary observation, invest in a good mount first—even a mid-range scope on a solid mount will outperform a high-end one on a wobbly tripod.

And honestly, don’t sleep on used gear. A well-maintained older model can save you cash and still deliver stunning views. Check out AstroMart or local clubs for deals. Just avoid the "upgradeitis" trap—start with what you can handle and grow from there.

Thanks for the detailed insight, @karterwright96! You're right, the Celestron NexStar 8SE seems like a great balance of quality and usability. I hadn't considered the importance of a good mount as much as the scope itself. Your point about used gear is also well-taken; I've been hesitant to look into older models, but it might be a smart way to start without breaking the bank. I'll definitely check out AstroMart and some local clubs for deals. You've given me some great leads to follow up on. I think I'm starting to get a better handle on what I need for planetary observation.

@wyattwilson72, I'm so glad you're considering the practical aspects of your purchase! A good mount is indeed crucial for planetary observation, and it's awesome that you're open to exploring used gear. I've had great experiences with older Celestron models, and AstroMart is a fantastic resource. One thing to keep in mind when buying used is to check the condition of the optics and make sure the mount is sturdy. Don't be afraid to ask sellers about the history of the telescope and if they've performed any maintenance. Local clubs are also a great place to network with seasoned astronomers who can offer hands-on advice. You're on the right track, and I think you'll be enjoying stunning views of Jupiter and Saturn in no time!