Seeking Advice on Choosing a 2025 Camera for Landscape Photography

The Sony A7R V is a beast for landscapes—insane resolution and dynamic range, but battery life is still a weak spot. If you're shooting long hikes, pack extra batteries or a grip. The Nikon Z7 II is a solid alternative with better ergonomics and slightly better battery performance, but Sony’s autofocus and lens lineup are hard to beat.

For landscapes, prioritize high megapixels (for cropping flexibility) and weather sealing (because you’ll be out in the elements). Also, check the lens ecosystem—Sony’s G Master lenses are phenomenal, but Nikon’s Z glass is catching up fast.

If you’re coming from a DSLR, the EVF might take some getting used to, but the real-time exposure preview is a game-changer. Don’t sleep on Fujifilm either—the GFX series is pricey but delivers medium-format quality in a portable body.

What’s your current setup? That might help narrow it down. And honestly, rent both for a weekend if you can—nothing beats hands-on testing!

I've used both systems extensively. The Sony A7R V delivers gorgeous image quality and top-notch autofocus, which is hard to beat for landscapes. But let’s be blunt—its battery life can be a major headache if you’re trekking remote trails. The Nikon Z7 II, on the other hand, offers more reliable battery performance and a more familiar, DSLR-ish ergonomics that might ease your transition. Both cameras have excellent weather sealing and robust lens ecosystems, so consider what's most important for your shoots. If your hikes are long and battery anxiety hovers over every trip, Nikon could save your day. However, if the extra detail is worth the extra battery juggling, Sony remains a stellar choice. Renting both for a weekend test can quickly clear things up. Choose based on your shooting style and endurance needs.

If battery life is a dealbreaker, I’d lean toward the Nikon Z7 II—nothing kills creativity like constantly swapping batteries mid-shoot. That said, Sony’s dynamic range and resolution are addictive for landscapes. I shot with an A7R IV for a year and the detail was jaw-dropping, but yeah, I carried three batteries like they were lifelines.

One thing nobody’s mentioned yet: weight. Mirrorless is lighter, but if you’re hiking miles, every ounce matters. The Z7 II feels more balanced with heavier lenses, while Sony’s compact body can get awkward with big glass.

Also, don’t sleep on used gear—plenty of A7R IIIs or Z7 Is out there for half the price, and they’re still fantastic. Renting is smart, but if you’re budget-conscious, older models might surprise you. Either way, you’re winning—both cameras are stellar. Just don’t forget a sturdy tripod!

I've been in a similar situation, and after testing both the Sony A7R V and Nikon Z7 II, I can attest that they are both top-notch choices. For landscape photography, the Sony's insane resolution and dynamic range are hard to beat. However, the battery life is a concern, especially on long hikes. I found that carrying a power bank and extra batteries mitigated this issue. The Nikon Z7 II, on the other hand, offers more reliable battery performance, but its image quality, while excellent, doesn't quite match Sony's level. If you're coming from a DSLR, the Nikon might feel more comfortable, but Sony's EVF and real-time preview are game-changers. I'd recommend renting both to see which one fits your needs, but if you're looking for a more budget-friendly option, consider the older A7R III or Z7 I – they're still fantastic cameras.

I completely agree with @ellismorris and @reagancox52 that both the Sony A7R V and Nikon Z7 II are excellent choices, but it ultimately comes down to your specific needs. If you're always on long hikes, the Nikon Z7 II's battery life might be a lifesaver. I've had experiences where I've run out of juice in the middle of nowhere, and it's frustrating. That said, Sony's image quality is incredibly tempting. One thing to consider is not just the camera body, but the entire ecosystem. If you're already invested in a particular brand's lenses, it might be worth sticking with that to avoid the cost and hassle of switching. Renting both cameras, as suggested, is a great idea. It'll give you a hands-on feel for what works best for you. Also, kudos to @reagancox52 for mentioning used gear – an older model like the A7R III can be a fantastic value.

"@phoenixbailey, thanks for your detailed insights. You're right, battery life is a crucial factor for me since I often spend hours hiking to get to those perfect landscape shots. I'm actually already invested in Sony lenses, which is part of why the Sony A7R V is so tempting. However, I hadn't considered the potential value of an older model like the A7R III. Renting both the Sony A7R V and Nikon Z7 II is a great idea to get a hands-on feel. I'll look into that. Your input has really helped clarify my priorities. I think I'm getting close to making a decision. Thanks again for your contribution!