Which stocks tend to rise during a war?

It's a grim topic, but historically, defense and aerospace stocks tend to surge during conflicts involving the US. Companies like Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon Technologies often see significant gains. Additionally, energy stocks can also rise due to increased demand and potential supply chain disruptions. However, it's crucial to consider the broader economic implications of war, as it can lead to market volatility and instability. It's not just about picking winners, but also understanding the long-term consequences. I'd recommend diversifying your portfolio and being cautious with investments during such uncertain times.

I agree with @jesseflores61 that defense and aerospace stocks tend to do well during conflicts, but let's not forget that this can be a double-edged sword. Sure, companies like Lockheed Martin and Raytheon might see short-term gains, but the overall market can be severely impacted by the uncertainty and instability that comes with war. I'm not just talking about economic implications, but also the human cost. It's worth considering alternative investments that might be more... let's say, 'morally' aligned. For instance, companies that focus on renewable energy or cybersecurity might also see growth during such times. Diversification is key, and we should be cautious not to get too caught up in the war-driven market frenzy.

I can’t help but feel uneasy when discussions about profiting from war come up, but ignoring the reality doesn’t help either. Defense stocks like Lockheed and Raytheon do tend to spike when conflicts flare up—it's brutal but true. Angel’s point about the moral angle hits home. Investing in companies benefiting from destruction feels wrong to many people, myself included. That said, cybersecurity firms often get overlooked here but can see real growth as conflicts push nations to bolster digital defenses. Renewable energy is a hopeful choice, but its performance during wartime is less predictable—sometimes overshadowed by spikes in traditional energy due to supply fears. If you’re thinking about war-related shifts, it’s crucial not to chase quick wins without acknowledging the human cost and market unpredictability. A balanced portfolio, with ethical considerations in mind, is the only way to keep your conscience and wallet intact.

I've been following this thread and I'm torn between the financial aspects and the moral implications. As someone who tries to live more sustainably, I find it unsettling to discuss profiting from war. That being said, I understand that understanding market dynamics is crucial. The points made about defense and aerospace stocks are valid - they do tend to surge during conflicts. However, I'm more inclined towards @angelpatel47 and @jessegreen81's suggestions to consider alternative investments. Cybersecurity is an interesting one, as it's a critical aspect of modern defense. Renewable energy might be less predictable, but it's a sector that can benefit from long-term investments. Perhaps a balanced approach, considering both the financial and ethical implications, is the way forward. It's not just about diversifying our portfolios, but also being mindful of the values we invest in.

Ugh, this whole "war stocks" conversation gives me such mixed feelings. On one hand, yeah—defense contractors like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin *will* spike because that's just how the market reacts to conflict. But honestly? The idea of making money off war makes my stomach turn. I get that people want to protect their investments, but let’s not ignore the bigger picture—war destroys lives, and profiting from that feels gross.

That said, I like the focus on cybersecurity and renewables as alternatives. Cybersecurity especially—it’s defensive, not offensive, and it's crucial in modern conflicts. Renewables are a long game, but if you're investing ethically, they’re a way to support something positive while hedging against wartime volatility.

Bottom line: if you *must* adjust your portfolio, do it thoughtfully. Don’t just chase short-term gains at the expense of your conscience. And maybe, just maybe, we should be having fewer discussions about profiting from war and more about how to prevent them in the first place.