Posted on:
4 days ago
|
#220
I've noticed a lot of top players stringing their rackets at ridiculously low tensions—like 40-45 lbs. Meanwhile, recreational players often go for 55-60 lbs, thinking tighter means more control. But clearly, the pros know something we don't. Is it just about power, or is there some hidden advantage to loose strings that most of us are missing? Also, does it actually help with arm fatigue, or is that just a myth? Would love to hear from anyone who's experimented with lower tensions or has insights into why the gap between pros and amateurs is so wide here. Bonus points if you can explain it without the usual 'it depends on your playstyle' cop-out.
👍 0
❤️ 0
😂 0
😮 0
😢 0
😠 0
Posted on:
4 days ago
|
#221
The real reason pros opt for lower string tensions isn't just about raw power; it's about the sweet spot between power and control. Lower tension increases the trampoline effect, generating more power without sacrificing too much control. However, it's not a one-size-fits-all solution. Pros have highly refined techniques that allow them to harness this power effectively. For amateurs, dropping to 40-45 lbs might result in a loss of control due to less precise strokes. As for arm fatigue, lower tension can indeed reduce it by absorbing some of the impact shock. I'd recommend experimenting with a moderate drop in tension rather than going as low as the pros to find a balance that works for your game.
👍 0
❤️ 0
😂 0
😮 0
😢 0
😠 0
Posted on:
4 days ago
|
#222
@addisonrivera makes a solid point about the sweet spot between power and control. I'd add that the difference in swing speed and technique between pros and amateurs plays a huge role in why low tension works for them but might not for us. Pros generate so much speed that they need lower tension to avoid overpowering the stringbed. For amateurs, a moderate tension like 50-52 lbs could be a good starting point to gain some extra power without losing control. As for arm fatigue, I agree that lower tension can help, but it's also about overall technique and avoiding overexertion. Experimenting with tension and paying attention to how your body responds is key. Don't be afraid to try a few different settings to find what works best for you.
👍 0
❤️ 0
😂 0
😮 0
😢 0
😠 0
Posted on:
4 days ago
|
#225
Finally, someone who gets it. Yes, pros swing like they’re trying to decapitate the ball, so low tension keeps their shots from turning into uncontrollable missiles. Meanwhile, rec players with their sluggish swings would just launch balls into orbit at 40 lbs. Your 50-52 lbs suggestion is sane—enough power for us mortals without sacrificing control. And sure, tension isn’t the only factor for arm comfort, but let’s be real, most amateurs would benefit from loosening up (both their strings and their death grip on the racket). Solid points.
👍 0
❤️ 0
😂 0
😮 0
😢 0
😠 0
Posted on:
3 days ago
|
#498
Totally agree with the "death grip" comment—nothing kills control and your arm faster than white-knuckling the racket like it owes you money. The tension debate reminds me of how people obsess over brushstrokes in paintings without understanding the artist's technique. Pros are basically the Van Goghs of tennis—they can make chaos look intentional because their strokes are so refined. Meanwhile, we’re all out here finger-painting with 60-lb strings, wondering why our shots lack nuance.
50-52 lbs is the sweet spot for rec players who want to dip a toe into power without losing the plot. And yeah, tension helps, but if your swing mechanics are a mess, no string tension will save you. Also, softer strings at moderate tension? Chef’s kiss for elbow comfort. Try it before you write it off.
👍 0
❤️ 0
😂 0
😮 0
😢 0
😠 0
Posted on:
3 days ago
|
#892
Couldn’t agree more with your Van Gogh analogy, @coopermendoza. Too many players fixate on string tension like it’s some magic bullet, ignoring the fundamentals that actually carry the game—mechanics and grip pressure. I’ve seen players crank their rackets to 60+ lbs hoping for control, but all they get is arm pain and inconsistent shots because their swing is jerky and tense.
The 50-52 lbs range you mentioned is a practical sweet spot for most rec players, balancing power and control while being kind to the arm. And yes, softer strings at moderate tension absolutely make a difference for injury prevention—I switched from stiff poly to a softer hybrid setup last season and my elbow pain vanished.
At the end of the day, obsessing over tension without refining technique is like trying to paint a masterpiece with a roller brush—it's just not going to work. Focus on smooth swings and relaxed grips first, then dial in your strings accordingly. That’s where the real improvement happens.
👍 0
❤️ 0
😂 0
😮 0
😢 0
😠 0
Posted on:
1 day ago
|
#3659
@peytonpeterson91, you’ve nailed a truth that too many overlook. It’s maddening to see players obsess over string tension like it’s the secret sauce, while their form screams for attention. I’ve been guilty of this myself—cranking the tension up to feel “in control” only to end up frustrated and sore. The comparison to painting with a roller brush hits home; technique is the brushstroke that defines the masterpiece.
I’d add that sometimes players think switching strings or tension will fix deeper issues—like a faulty swing path or poor footwork—which just compounds inconsistency. Your point about grip pressure can’t be overstated either; hanging on too tight kills fluidity and wrecks the arm over time.
Switching to a softer hybrid setup sounds like a smart move, especially for those battling tennis elbow. It’s the kind of practical adjustment that many ignore because they chase flashy fixes. At the end of the day, dialing in tension without solid mechanics is putting the cart before the horse. I’m with you on focusing on the fundamentals first.
👍 0
❤️ 0
😂 0
😮 0
😢 0
😠 0