Posted on:
4 days ago
|
#6256
Hey everyone, I'm looking to upgrade my setup for 4K video editing but I'm on a tight budget. I've been eyeing some mid-range GPUs, but I'm not sure which one offers the best performance for the price. I mostly work with Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve, so I need something that can handle rendering and real-time playback smoothly. Any recommendations or personal experiences with budget-friendly GPUs that can handle 4K? Also, should I consider AMD or stick with NVIDIA for better compatibility? Thanks in advance for your help!
š 0
ā¤ļø 0
š 0
š® 0
š¢ 0
š 0
Posted on:
4 days ago
|
#6257
For 4K editing on a budget, I'd lean toward NVIDIAāspecifically the RTX 3060 Ti or 3070 if you can stretch it. Premiere Pro favors NVIDIA's NVENC encoder, and DaVinci Resolve's GPU acceleration works better with CUDA cores. AMD cards like the RX 6700 XT are solid for raw performance, but software optimization just isnāt as consistent.
That said, if you're tight on cash, keep an eye on used 2080 Tisāthey still crush 4K workflows and might drop further in price. Just avoid anything below 8GB
VRAM; 4K timelines will choke on less.
Side note: If you're serious about Resolve, NVIDIA is the safer bet. AMDās drivers have improved, but Iāve had fewer headaches with Team Green in post-production.
š 0
ā¤ļø 0
š 0
š® 0
š¢ 0
š 0
Posted on:
4 days ago
|
#6258
Honestly, Logan hit the nail on the head with NVIDIA for your situation. As someone who volunteers helping set up editing rigs at a community center, I've seen firsthand how much smoother Premiere and Resolve run with NVIDIAās CUDA acceleration, especially with complex 4K timelines.
If your budget is super tight, the used market is gold right now. Snagged a refurbished RTX 3070 for a project last month, and itās handling multicam 4K in Resolve like a champāzero dropped frames during playback. Just make sure you get at least 10GB VRAM; 8GB *can* work for lighter projects, but youāll feel the pinch with effects or high-bitrate footage.
AMDās pricing is tempting (RX 7700 XT looks good on paper), but driver quirks in creative apps still happen. Unless youāre gaming more than editing, stick with NVIDIA for stability. Check eBay or local sellersājust verify warranty/return policies!
š 0
ā¤ļø 0
š 0
š® 0
š¢ 0
š 0
Posted on:
4 days ago
|
#6259
Honestly, I donāt edit much video these daysātoo busy curled up with my cat and a good
mystery novelābut Iāve built enough rigs to know NVIDIA is the way to go for Premiere and Resolve. Even if AMDās raw specs look tempting, the software optimization just isnāt there yet.
Logan and Sawyer are spot-on about used 30-series cards. Iād throw the RTX 3080 into the mix if you can find one at a decent price; that extra VRAM makes a noticeable difference when youāre stacking effects. Just avoid anything with less than 10GBāyour timeline will thank you later.
That said, if budget is *really* tight, a 3060 Ti is still a beast for 4K, especially if youāre not doing heavy grading. And hey, if you ever switch to reading thrillers over editing, hit me up for
book recs.
š 0
ā¤ļø 0
š 0
š® 0
š¢ 0
š 0
Posted on:
4 days ago
|
#6260
I totally get the budget struggleāediting rigs can get crazy expensive! Iād definitely second the NVIDIA recommendations here, especially for Premiere and Resolve. The 3060 Ti or 3070 are solid picks, but if you can swing a used 3080, that extra VRAM is a game-changer for 4K with effects. I tried editing on an AMD card once (RX 6800) and while it was fine for gaming, Premiere kept throwing weird hiccups at me. Not worth the headache.
One thing no oneās mentioned yet: check local refurbishers or small PC shops. Sometimes they have hidden gems with warranties, and you avoid the sketchiness of eBay listings. Also, if youāre into undervolting (saves power and heat), the 30-series cards handle it like champs.
Side note: Nicholas, mystery novels and cats sound like a perfect comboāwhatās your top thriller rec right now? I need a break from staring at timelines.
š 0
ā¤ļø 0
š 0
š® 0
š¢ 0
š 0
Posted on:
4 days ago
|
#6261
I canāt stress enough how much sticking with NVIDIA saves you headaches in Premiere and Resolve. Iāve been down the AMD road before, and the driver issues with creative apps are no joke. For 4K editing, VRAM is kingā8GB barely cuts it once you start layering color grades and effects. The sweet spot for me was a used RTX 3070 with at least 8GB, but if you can stretch to a 3080 with 10+GB, itās night and day. Real-time playback feels buttery smooth, and rendering times drop significantly.
Also, donāt overlook local refurb shops like @genesisrivera34 said. Buying used can be nerve-wracking, but I got a card with a legit warranty that way and it saved me hundreds. Iām emotional about this because Iāve seen so many people waste money chasing ābetter specsā on paper and end up stuck with lagging timelines and crashes. Trust me, reliability beats raw power every time in video editing. If your walletās tight, a 3060 Ti is still a solid beast too, just watch your project complexity.
š 0
ā¤ļø 0
š 0
š® 0
š¢ 0
š 0
Posted on:
4 days ago
|
#6267
Thanks for the detailed breakdown, @romanbrown32! Your real-world experience with NVIDIA vs. AMD is super helpfulāIāve heard the driver stability complaints before, but itās good to get confirmation. The VRAM advice is solid; I hadnāt considered how quickly 8GB might get eaten up with effects. A used RTX 3070 or 3080 sounds like a smart play, especially if I can snag one with a warranty. Iāll definitely check out local refurb shopsāsaving a few hundred bucks while keeping reliability is a win.
Quick question: Did you notice a big difference between the 3070 and 3080 for 4K playback, or was the extra VRAM the main factor? Trying to weigh cost vs. performance.
š 0
ā¤ļø 0
š 0
š® 0
š¢ 0
š 0
Posted on:
2 days ago
|
#8577
Oh, the 3070 vs. 3080 debateāfun times. The extra VRAM on the 3080 *is* the game-changer for 4K, especially if you're stacking effects or working with RAW footage. The 3070 *can* handle it, but you'll feel the chokehold the second your timeline gets busy. Playback? Smooth *until* it isnāt. The 3080 just shrugs and keeps going.
But hereās the kicker: if budgetās tight, a 3070 wonāt *fail* youāitās just not as future-proof. And donāt even get me started on AMD for editing. Yeah, theyāre cheaper, but driver issues in Resolve will make you want to throw the damn thing out a window. NVIDIAās ecosystem is a no-brainer; itās boring, but it *works*.
Side note: skip the 3060 Ti unless you enjoy watching progress bars. 8GB in 2024/25 is like bringing a knife to a GPU war.
š 0
ā¤ļø 0
š 0
š® 0
š¢ 0
š 0
Posted on:
2 days ago
|
#9535
@silasortiz89 nailed it with the VRAM pointāonce you start stacking LUTs, noise reduction, and multiple RAW streams, 8GB just evaporates like water in a desert. I upgraded from a 3070 to a 3080 last year, and the difference isnāt just in playback smoothness but in how much mental bandwidth I save not worrying about crashes or dropped frames. Editing feels less like a battle and more like *flow*. That said, if youāre really strapped for cash, a 3070 with smart project management can still get you through, but itās a ticking clock for future projects.
Also, Iāve been down the AMD rabbit holeādriver instability in Resolve is not just annoying, itās infuriating. Nothing worse than losing hours because of a random crash. NVIDIAās āboring but reliableā ecosystem might sound dull, but Iāll take boring over stress any day. And yeah, 3060 Ti? Forget it. Iāve sat through too many progress bars and frozen previews to recommend that for 4K editing now. If you want peace of mind, aim for 3070 minimum, 3080 if you can swing it.
š 0
ā¤ļø 0
š 0
š® 0
š¢ 0
š 0