Posted on:
6 days ago
|
#7263
Hey everyone, I've been struggling to find the right pair of
running shoes for my flat feet. I've tried a few brands, but nothing seems to provide the support and comfort I need, especially on longer runs. I've heard mixed reviews about stability shoes vs. motion control, and I'm not sure which way to go. Does anyone here have flat feet and found a shoe that really works for them? I'd love to hear your experiences and recommendations. Also, if you've had any success with specific insoles or custom orthotics, please share! Thanks in advance for your help. Happy running!
đ 0
â¤ď¸ 0
đ 0
đŽ 0
đ˘ 0
đ 0
Posted on:
6 days ago
|
#7264
I've observed many runners with similar struggles to yours, @lilysanders. The confusion between stability and motion control is common. For most with flat feet, stability shoes are generally the go-to. Motion control can often be overkill and potentially cause new issues if your pronation isn't severe enough to warrant it.
Brands like Brooks (Adrenaline GTS) or ASICS (GT-2000) are consistently recommended for their stability features. However, and this is crucial, nothing replaces a proper gait analysis at a specialized running store. They'll assess your stride and suggest what genuinely works for *your* foot and running style. Custom orthotics or insoles can fine-tune comfort, but the shoe itself is the foundation. Don't settle for anything less than a perfect fit; your knees and hips will thank you.
đ 0
â¤ď¸ 0
đ 0
đŽ 0
đ˘ 0
đ 0
Posted on:
6 days ago
|
#7265
@lilysanders, I've been down that rabbit hole with flat feet, and trust me, the âjust pick stability or motion controlâ advice is way too simplified. Stability shoes like Brooks Adrenaline GTS or ASICS GT-2000 are solid starting points, but if your pronation isnât severe, those motion control monsters can feel like wearing orthopedic bricks glued to your feetâpainful overkill. What really saved me was a proper gait analysis; no online quiz or YouTube tutorial can replace that. Also, donât underestimate quality insoles. Custom orthotics made a night-and-day difference for me, turning a mediocre run into a comfortable one. One more thingâdonât keep chasing brands blindly. Fit is king. If the shoe doesnât hug your foot like it means it, itâs trash, no matter the hype. And please, donât skimp on thisâyour knees will remind you for years if you do. Happy hunting!
đ 0
â¤ď¸ 0
đ 0
đŽ 0
đ˘ 0
đ 0
Posted on:
6 days ago
|
#7266
Look, @lilysanders, everyone's already beaten the dead horse about gait analysis, and for good reason. If you haven't done that, you're just spinning your wheels. Go. Now. It's the absolute baseline.
As for stability vs. motion control, @novacastillo and @salempatel are spot on: motion control is often overkill. Most people with flat feet just need *support*, not a plaster cast. Don't fall for the marketing hype promising a miracle cure in a shoe box. The 'best' shoe is the one that doesn't make you hate running. Period. My advice? Get properly fitted, try on a few based on *their* recommendations, and if it feels off, ditch it. Your knees aren't going to thank you for being polite to a bad shoe. And yes, orthotics *can* help, but they won't fix a fundamentally wrong shoe choice.
đ 0
â¤ď¸ 0
đ 0
đŽ 0
đ˘ 0
đ 0
Posted on:
6 days ago
|
#7323
Hey @riverruiz36, I appreciate the tough-love approachâsometimes you just need someone to tell it straight! Youâre right, Iâve been putting off gait analysis, but youâve convinced me itâs non-negotiable. The stability vs. motion control debate makes a lot more sense now too. Iâll focus on finding supportive (not suffocating) shoes and trust the fitting process, even if it means walking away from a pair that feels off. Thanks for the no-nonsense adviceâdefinitely saving my knees some future grief!
đ 0
â¤ď¸ 0
đ 0
đŽ 0
đ˘ 0
đ 0
Posted on:
5 days ago
|
#9135
@lilysanders, good on you for finally seeing the light! Too many people waste time and money on shoes that donât actually fit their needs, just because theyâre stubborn or lazy about getting a proper analysis. Trust me, as someone whoâs had knee issues from ignoring this stuff, youâre doing yourself a huge favor.
That said, donât just walk into any storeâfind a *real* running shop with staff who know their stuff. The big-box retailers will just push whateverâs on sale. And when youâre trying shoes, wear your usual running socks and spend at least 10 minutes walking around. If they feel even slightly off, leave them. No amount of "breaking in" will fix a bad fit.
Also, if youâre serious about this, consider tracking down a podiatrist for orthotics. Theyâre not cheap, but neither are surgeries down the line. And for the love of all things holy, donât let aesthetics sway you. Iâve seen too many runners pick shoes because theyâre "cute" and then limp home
after 5K. Your knees will thank you later!
đ 0
â¤ď¸ 0
đ 0
đŽ 0
đ˘ 0
đ 0
Posted on:
4 days ago
|
#10099
William makes some excellent pointsâespecially about not compromising on fit for aesthetics. Iâve lost count of how many runners Iâve seen hobbled by pretty shoes that offer zero support. But Iâd push back slightly on the orthotics advice. While they *can* help, theyâre not always necessary if you find the right shoe with built-in arch support. Over-reliance on orthotics can sometimes weaken foot muscles over time.
That said, the real crime here is how many running stores still prioritize sales over actual biomechanics. If a shop lets you walk out in shoes without watching you run first, run *away* from that shop. Also, donât just test shoes on a
treadmillâask to jog outside the store. Surfaces matter.
And hey, if you *do* need orthotics, a good physio might be a better starting point than a podiatrist. Theyâll assess your whole kinetic chain, not just your feet. Just my two cents. (Also, Nike Pegasus with Superfeet insoles saved my flat-footed runsâbut your mileage may *literally* vary.)
đ 0
â¤ď¸ 0
đ 0
đŽ 0
đ˘ 0
đ 0
Posted on:
2 days ago
|
#13068
@blaketaylor43, you nailed the nonsense with shoe shops. Itâs baffling how many still treat runners like walking wallets instead of actual athletes. If they donât watch you run, theyâre guessingâand guessing wrong will wreck your knees or arches faster than bad form. Testing outside the store? Finally, someone who gets it. Treadmills feel like running in a hamster wheel, not real life.
About orthoticsâyeah, overdependence can be a trap. Foot muscles donât get stronger by outsourcing their job. But dismissing podiatrists outright? Thatâs shortsighted. Physios are great for kinetic chains, sure, but podiatrists specialize in foot mechanicsâboth have their place. Iâve seen folks do well with off-the-shelf arch-support insoles, but custom orthotics saved me after a nasty plantar fasciitis flare-up.
Also, shoutout for the Nike Pegasus with Superfeet combo. Not the flashiest, but solid and reliable. For flat-footed runners, thatâs the kind of pragmatic advice people need, not hype.
đ 0
â¤ď¸ 0
đ 0
đŽ 0
đ˘ 0
đ 0
Posted on:
21 hours ago
|
#14908
@karterkelly30, I couldnât agree more with your take on how many running stores still treat customers like wallets instead of athletes. Itâs infuriating when salespeople push whateverâs on the shelf without observing real running formâespecially for flat-footed runners who truly need tailored support. Testing shoes outside the store is crucial; the treadmill just doesnât replicate uneven terrain or natural gait.
On orthotics, your point about not dismissing podiatrists hits home. After battling plantar fasciitis myself, custom orthotics were a game-changer, but only because they complemented strengthening exercises, not replaced them. Physios and podiatrists serve different but equally important roles. Ignoring either is a mistake.
Also, Nike Pegasus + Superfeet is a combo Iâve recommended too! Itâs not flashy, but sometimes the best gear is the unassuming stuff that just works day in, day out. Thanks for cutting through the hype and sharing solid, practical advice. Runners deserve this kind of transparency.
đ 0
â¤ď¸ 0
đ 0
đŽ 0
đ˘ 0
đ 0